Skip to main content
Seviranta

Continuously and provably compliant, from growing platform to enterprise

Continuous monitoring at code level with a compliance dossier that grows with your platform every day. Suited to a single web shop and to international environments with thousands of pages, ready for enforcement of the European Accessibility Act.

What sets Seviranta apart

One system, one standard, one body of evidence

Scan, continuous monitoring and a compliance record on the same WCAG measuring stick, not separate tools.

Continuous, not a snapshot

Measurements that run alongside your platform every day, not an audit that is outdated after a single deploy.

Code level, not an overlay widget

Fixes in your own source code, not a layer that hides the real errors or slows your site down.

From webshop to enterprise

Suitable for a single site and for international environments with thousands of pages.

Instead, structural assurance of accessibility, at the level that regulators test against.

No account needed. We scan one page of your site at full depth and keep nothing.

Insight within 60 seconds · no account · 0% impact on your load speed

57%

of issues automated detection reliably catches (Deque research); human work catches the rest.

0%

impact on your load speed: we scan externally from EU servers, no script on your site.

EU

data in Frankfurt, GDPR by design, no US framework patched up for Europe.

€69

and up, per month, predictable, no opaque consultancy quotes.

European, built for European law

Built for the EAA and EN 301 549, with dossiers that line up with European regulators. 11 languages, billing in euros, data hosting in the EU (Frankfurt) and GDPR by design. No US framework patched up for Europe.

Code-level, not a layer on top

We point out the error in your own source code, with the exact line and a concrete fix. You apply it and keep it, a permanent part of your codebase, even if you ever cancel. An overlay widget puts a layer over your site and never repairs the underlying code.

What the machine does and doesn't catch

According to Deque research, automated tests catch about 57% of accessibility errors. We put that in writing in every report. Anyone promising you 100% with one line of JavaScript is selling false certainty.

Predictable costs, no costly consultancy

Classic audit projects quickly cost thousands to tens of thousands of euros each time and go out of date fast. With Seviranta you automate the basics through our self-serve platform from €69 a month. No opaque quotes or mandatory consultancy hours, but enterprise quality that scales to larger platforms and teams.

We do it ourselves too

Our own site scores 0 violations on the same axe-core engine, the world standard that Google Lighthouse uses too, that we scan your site with. We don't promise 100%: the machine catches the reliably automatable part, human work does the rest. But you don't have to take our word for it:

see a real example report

Who is this actually for?

Accessibility is not a checkbox for a regulator, it decides whether roughly 1 in 6 people (WHO) can use your site at all. This is what that looks like in practice:

Screen reader users

People who are blind or have low vision have the page read aloud by software such as VoiceOver, NVDA or JAWS. If an alt text is missing or the heading structure is broken, your product page is literally a black hole.

Keyboard navigation

People with motor impairments (or a tremor, or RSI) use the web without a mouse. An order button that only responds to a mouse click means: cart full, checkout impossible.

Audio description and captions

Video without captions excludes deaf and hard-of-hearing visitors; without audio description, blind viewers miss what is shown. The EAA sets requirements here, audiovisual services fall under the law.

Contrast and readability

Light grey text on white looks sleek in the pitch deck, but is unreadable for anyone with reduced vision, and for everyone using a phone in the sun. Accessibility helps all your visitors, not just the 1 in 6.

That is who you are doing this for. Which is why we treat accessibility not as a checkbox but as human work with measurable proof, and why, for the testing only humans can do, we work with human experts.

One-off audit, overlay widget or Seviranta?

Three ways of dealing with accessibility, laid out plainly side by side:

One-off auditOverlay widgetSeviranta
Cost structureHigh one-off investment, thousands of euros per audit.Monthly licence, often based on visitor numbers.Transparent monthly price from €69 based on pages. No surprises as traffic grows.
Shelf lifeA snapshot, outdated from the first deploy after itOnly works while you pay; afterwards everything is goneContinuous, up to date every day
Real code fixesRecommendations on paper; implementing is up to youNo, a layer over your site, the code stays brokenYes, concrete fixes in your own code, permanent
Evidence under the EAAA single static PDF report, dated on the audit day.No historical dossier of the actual source-code improvements.A growing compliance dossier: a complete record of scans, errors found and manually resolved.
Monitoring & alertsNo, no visibility until the next auditHides issues instead of reporting themAutomatic rescans on a fixed cadence + alerts on new issues

General characterisations of product categories, not an assessment of individual vendors.

See the comparison with other providers

See where your site stands within one minute