SevirantaTransparent market comparison
Accessibility software compared: which approach holds up under the EAA?
When choosing a WCAG compliance partner, it comes down to facts, not marketing promises. We place solutions side by side based on public sources and technical architecture, so you can draw the conclusion yourself, independently and with solid grounding.
What this comparison promises
Facts, not slogans
Comparisons are based on public documentation and recognized standards.
Architecture instead of words
How tools work technically determines how well they hold up under the EAA.
Open, traceable sources
Every claim is traceable back to the original source.
You decide what counts
No scoreboards that fill in your priorities for you, the comparison shows the data.
38.5%
of sued companies already had a 'solution'
According to AudioEye's own 2026 Litigation Report, nearly 40% of sued organisations already had an accessibility widget or toolbar installed. Plaintiffs showed that vital functions, such as checkout, were still unusable. An overlay masks errors; only code repair solves them.
JavaScript overlay widgets
These providers place a temporary layer over your site. The source code stays defective, and independent experts and regulators are critical of the "100% compliant" promise that often comes with it.
AudioEyeOverlay
Publicly listed US player with an automated overlay layer. Seviranta repairs directly in your own source code and publishes open prices.
Read the full comparisonaccessiBeOverlay
Received a $1 million FTC settlement for misleading compliance claims. Seviranta makes no false 100% promise but splits machine and human work cleanly.
Read the full comparisonUserWay
An overlay widget that places a layer over your site. Seviranta repairs the underlying code, a lasting fix that reaches every assistive tool.
EqualWeb
Combines an overlay with periodic scans. Seviranta monitors continuously at the code level, with a retainable dossier as evidence.
Source-code repair & enterprise
These providers work at the code level, just like Seviranta. The difference is how you buy and use the software: enterprise sales and consultancy, or self-serve and transparently priced.
SiteimproveCode level
Mature European governance platform for large organisations, via a sales process. Seviranta offers the same code integrity but delivers the fix itself, self-serve and transparently priced.
Read the full comparisonDequeCode level
Maker of axe-core, the engine Seviranta runs on too, the industry standard. Deque targets developers; Seviranta turns that enterprise strength into a workable service.
Read the full comparisonLevel Access
Enterprise accessibility with audits and consultancy, heavily people-driven. Seviranta automates the basics and delivers the same standard self-serve and scalably.
UsableNet
Enterprise provider with managed services on quote. Seviranta gives you the same code quality without a consultancy process, direct and scalable.
Read: overlay or code repair, you decide →
How we compare
- 1
Public sources only: the provider's own website and press releases, stock-market filings and independent reviews.
- 2
Every figure gets a reference date, because figures go out of date.
- 3
Facts, not mud: we explain the differences and you draw the conclusion.
One thing up front: we are an interested party in this comparison. Weigh that in, check the sources and decide for yourself.